
Open 16
Anniversary issue
The Art Biennial as a Global Phenomenon
Strategies in Neo-Political Times
On 19 October 2008, in connection with the first Brussels Biennial and in association with the Flemish-Dutch Huis deBuren, the Flemish foundation for visual, audio-visual and media art BAM and the Lectureship in Arts in Society of the Fontys College for the Arts, Pascal Gielen organised a programme of lectures and debates focussing on the art biennial as a global phenomenon.
The speeches by Chantal Mouffe, Michael Hardt, Boris Groys, Charles Esche and Maria Hlavajova are now being published in Open, Cahier on Art and the Public Domain, supplemented with essays by Brian Holmes, Irit Rogoff, Simon Sheikh and Thierry de Duve. The texts have been edited by Pascal Gielen and Jorinde Seijdel, editor-in-chief of Open. This extra issue of Open is also a jubilee issue to celebrate the fifth anniversary of the cahier in its present form.
Open 16 is a co-production by BAM, de Buren, the Foundation for Art and Public Space (SKOR) and the Fontys University of Fine and Performing Arts. With thanks to the first Brussels Biennial
Editors: Jorinde Seijdel and Liesbeth Melis
Design: Thomas Buxó and Klaartje van Eijk
English edition
ISBN 978-90-5662-667-9
€ 28.50
Contents Open 16, The Art Biennial as a Global Phenomenon. Strategies in Neo-Political Times
Jorinde Seijdel
Editorial
The Art Biennial as a Global Phenomenon
Strategies in Neo-Political Times
Online article
Pascal Gielen
The Biennale: A Post-Institution for Immaterial Labour
Online article
By means of an analysis, sociologist Pascal Gielen attempts to get a better handle on the problematic aspects of the art biennale as a global phenomenon. Only then can new strategies be developed for escaping the worldwide competition hysteria, with all its negatives characteristics. Neoliberal city marketing as the bogeyman is too facile an explanation.
Michael Hardt
Production and Distribution of the Common
A Few Questions for the Artist
Online article
According to Michael Hardt, the production of the common is the most important economic mainspring in a time in which immaterial and biopolitical production are dominant. By connecting economics, politics and aesthetics and analysing their relations, Hardt arrives at questions concerning the role of the artist and the meaning of his or her work in the distribution of the common.
Chantal Mouffe
Democratic Politics in the Age of Post-Fordism
Political philosopher Chantal Mouffe shows how the existing hegemonic structures in current political systems can best be opposed by the development of counter-hegemonic practices. Specifically, cultural and artistic practices can play a major role in this because they are pre-eminently the terrain on which new subjectivities can be developed.
Thierry de Duve
The Glocal and the Singuniversal
Reflections on Art and Culture in the Global World
According to Belgian philosopher Thierry de Duve, the criticism of the art biennial as a global phenomenon from the perspective of economic and amusement value is too limited. By allowing the aesthetic value of art to again be part of art criticism, a different type of opposition against the hegemonic centres that are dominant in today’s global culture becomes possible. To achieve this, De Duve lays claim to the Kantian idea of sensus communis – the human ability to share feelings.
Boris Groys
From Medium to Message
The Art Exhibition as Model of a New World Order
Art philosopher Boris Groys sees the art installation as a way of making hidden reality visible. The ambiguous meaning of the notion of freedom that Groys observes in our democratic order is also present in the contemporary art installation. This can be exposed by examining it and analysing the role of the artist and the curator. The public space created by the installation, and by the biennial, is the model for a new political world order.
Simon Sheikh
Marks of Distinction, Vectors of Possibility
Questions for the Biennial
In order to fathom the real meaning and opportunities of biennials as a global phenomenon, Scandinavian critic and curator Simon Sheikh introduces the term a politics of translation. Seen in this light, the biennial is a place where new meanings, stories, histories and connections are constantly produced. This condition of permanent flux may mean that biennials can do more than generate capital.
Brian Holmes
The Interscale
Art after Neoliberalism
Online article
Now that neoliberalism seems to be in decline, Brian Holms wonders what this will mean for the emergence of Asian biennials. In reference to the concept of the sixth Taipei Biennial – undeniably a neoliberal stronghold – and a few of the works of art presented there, he discovers possibilities to imbue this transcontinental exchange with new meaning on various scale levels.
Chales Esche and Maria Hlavajova
The Making of Once is Nothing
How to Say No while Still Saying Yes . . .
Charles Esche and Maria Hlavajova were invited, as representatives of Van Abbemuseum in Eindhoven and BAK in Utrecht respectively, to contribute to the Brussels Biennial. With ‘Once is Nothing’1 they tried, from their position of institutional responsibility, to find an answer to the fleeting character of many biennials and their economically motivated quest for modernization.
Irit Rogoff
Geo-Cultures
Circuits of Arts and Globalizations
‘Geo-Cultures’, a research project conducted by Irit Rogoff, a professor at Goldsmiths College in London, investigates how the contemporary practice of art informs rather than reflects globalization processes. Seen in the framework of this study, biennials are interesting places. They have evolved into circuits of research, exchange and dialogue that combine specific local features with the illumination of conditions elsewhere in the world.
Foundation Art and Public Space